MacDiamond Nyamekor asked:
"A question for all homosexuals. If you truly don't need the opposite sex for the act, why does one of you always have to play the role of the oppossite sex during your same sex session? And why are some of you bisexual, supplementing your same sex affair with an opposite sex one? Inadequate satisfaction from your same sex partner? Send answer if you have got the guts".
"A question for all homosexuals. If you truly don't need the opposite sex for the act, why does one of you always have to play the role of the oppossite sex during your same sex session? And why are some of you bisexual, supplementing your same sex affair with an opposite sex one? Inadequate satisfaction from your same sex partner? Send answer if you have got the guts".
This simple agenda triggered a rather too emotional and conservationist responses from his contacts.
Sandra Amoasiwa Rankson said:
food for thought
Uche Matilda wrote:
Because of the implications in it..
Frank Afari replied:
Homosexuals don't need an opposite sex. The principle behind their desire is simple: one man needs a "hard" masculine figure to give pleasure to. Another man needs that pleasure. So both enter into a mutual reciprocal relationship; a kind of donor/recipient style for mutual pleasure. Here the idea of opposite sex is not implied at all, Mac, don't get it wrong. Nevertheless it is an awfully sinful partnership. Abhorrent, disgusting, mammalian. Mac, I'm told there are a few homosexuals in high positions. I'm told of one whose lower abdomen is in a bad state as a result of his partner's insatiable, grueling horsepower. I wish we could contact him to tell us what on earth is the secret behind the oomph they derive from their fellow man's body.
Max Kafui Agbai opined:
Right on brother!at the risk of invoking a cliche',God (Mawu Sogbolisa),created ADAM and EVE, not ADAM and STEVE! I fail to see how anybody can derive pleasure from a place where 'the sun doesn't shine'!the mere thought of that act make me want to throw up!am sorry!
Dilys Sillah took it scripturally:
for God so loved the world...
Kojo Gyabaah spewed out this:
I cannot ever understand their reasoning. Imagine Elton John seeking to adopt a Ukrainian child. It sounded so preposterous to me. You (i.e. he Elton John) think and say that marriage is merely about partnership and NOT procreation yet you (he Elton John) want humanity to survive much more for you (him) seek to to adopt and raise somebody else's child. If everybody is a homosexual like Elton John, then whose child would be available for adoption?
The truth is God created us all gullible in that at one point or the other we have need for the complementary sex. This is the normal expectation to have fellow-feeling with the complementary sex. Anybody who feels otherwise needs to be examined for congenital disorder irrespective of whatever pronouncement the so-called experts make. They (mental health experts) can have their say but let's defend the truth. Our physical make up absolutely runs contrary to this absurdity called homosexuality or whatever polishing name they have given it. They don't get any satisfaction for their insatiable damnable act.
To be a homosexual doesn't mean no need of the opposite sex. It's only a fact of preference. You can prefer black people to white, you can only have attraction for tall and skinny girls, or big ass ladies, etc... It is just a matter of preference. Homosexuals are very good friends with opposite sex, just like some people can be very friendly with some type of person but they will never stand to share their life with. I know you are a good Christian, even though you may be tolerant and friendly with those who don't believe in God, you may not accept a lady who doesn't believe in God at all as your wife. I am wrong? We are all different, and to live in a peaceful world, we need to be tolerant.
No comments:
Post a Comment