Though the controversial, corrected
Constitutional Instrument (C.I. 73) for the creation of 45 new
constituencies laid before Parliament will satisfy the
constitutionally-mandated 21 sitting days in September and become law,
there is uncertainty surrounding the existence of the constituencies for
the December elections as a result of pending court cases and
inadequate time.
The first uncertainty arises from the legal implications and effects
of pending judgments of cases before the Supreme Court and the High
Court on the fate of the proposed creation of 45 constituencies by the
Electoral Commission (EC) and the creation of 45 Municipal and District
Assemblies (MDAs) by the government.
If by their decisions the Supreme Court and/or High Court nullify the
creation of the constituencies and MDAs, then the 45 additional
constituencies will not be available for the forthcoming presidential
and parliamentary elections, contend legal experts. The nullification of
C.I. 73, and by extension the 45 constituencies, by the courts will
affect the legality and operations of the MDAs since every district must
have a constituency. Similarly, if the courts illegalise the
newly-created MDAs, going by the legal requirement that every district
must have a constituency, then it implies that the new constituencies
cannot exist.
The court cases likely to affect the creation of the constituencies
and the MDAs include a writ filed by Messrs Richard Odum Bortier and
Daniel Quaye at the Fast Track High Court in Accra on May 28 restraining
the EC from creating the new constituencies. The High Court, however,
stroke out a contempt case against seven commissioners of the EC on
Thursday. In an affidavit to supporting the contempt motion, the
applicants stated that "the respondents were aware of the other reliefs
seeking an order to restrain the Electoral Commission which acts through
them, from creating new constituencies except upon publishing a
Constitutional Instrument setting forth clearly the bases, process and
methodology by which it does its work.
"Yet the commission acting through the respondents had proceeded to
create the new constituencies with abandoned nonchalance which conduct
is aimed at prejudicing and interfering with the administration of
justice."
Also, four opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) lawyers, namely Nii
Ayikoi Otoo, Captain Nkrabiah Effah-Dartey(rtd), Frank Davies and Samuel
Atta Akyea, in separate suits, have dragged the EC to the Supreme Court
over the creation of the 45 constituencies and the 45 newly inaugurated
districts.
The controversy over the creation of the new constituencies and MDAs
is even murkier as a group calling itself Concerned Citizens of Ghana
(CCG) led by Mr Frank Davies, a former Greater Accra Regional Bar
Association President and an NPP constituency executive in the region,
took the EC and the government to the High Court over the creation of
the MDAs and constituencies. The CCG claimed in a writ of summons that
the government failed to address the associated problems of equity and
fairness, by ensuring equal representation in the re-alignment exercise.
It claimed the creation of the new districts was in contravention of
the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 (Act 462), describing
the creation of several of the new districts and municipalities as
illegal. The plaintiffs are seeking an order declaring the MMDAs and
constituencies null and void.
Prior to this case, Nii Ayikoi Otoo, an ex-Attorney- General and
Minister of Justice under the Kufuor administration, also filed a case
at the High Court on behalf of the a group who want the newly created
MMDAs and constituencies declared null and void. Ayikoi Otoo also sued
the EC over the creation of 45 new constituencies. He said: "Under our
Constitution - Article 47 (3) provides that the boundaries of each
constituency must be such that the number of inhabitants in a
constituency is as nearly as possible equal to the population quota. It
is our view that this population quota is not being adequately
addressed."
He noted: "If you look at the Constitutional provision, it enjoins
the Electoral Commission to by Constitutional Instrument make
regulations for effective performance of its functions, yet the EC has
never published any Constitutional Instrument by which they over the
years have been reviewing and creating constituencies in Ghana."
Majority Leader Cletus Avoka laid the C.I.73 before Parliament on
Wednesday after he withdrew the error-ridden first instrument one which
was laid before the House on July 17 and was due to come into force by
the end of Wednesday. The corrected C.I. 73 needs 21 parliamentary
sittings to take effect. Mr Avoka, therefore, before laying the C.I.,
informed the House that the Majority and Minority leadership, in
conjunction with the Parliamentary Speaker, would find an appropriate
date for Parliament to reconvene after it goes on recess on Thursday.
He explicated that although the EC had wanted to correct the C.I, it
was impossible for it to do so as a result of some constitutional and
Supreme Court rulings. "Confronted with this challenge, the only option
opened to it was for the EC to withdraw the original C.I 73 and
substitute it with the corrected version."
Mr Avoka said some mistakes detected in the new version of the C.I 73
had already been corrected to avoid the repetition of the situation in
which the House found itself now. He said he asked the permission of the
Speaker of the House, Mrs Joyce Bamford-Addo to recall Parliament, due
to go on recess, to allow for the 21 days for the legislation to mature
On Tuesday, the Majority and Minority in Parliament and the EC agreed
to withdraw the first C.I. 73 for rectification after exchanging heated
differing arguments on the relevance and effects of the CI, and on the
procedures and processes involved in husbanding and transforming it into
a statute. The parliamentary leadership withdrew the C.I. because of
what some Members of Parliament (MPs) described as "errors," "omissions"
and "corrections."
Serious disagreements greeted the deliberation of CI 73 when it
introduced to the House. MPs mainly from the governing NDC and the
opposition NPP met to consider arguments for and against the withdrawal
of the C.I. That was after the Committee on Subsidiary Legislation of
Parliament found fault with several aspects of the ill-fated C.I. Many
grammatical and typographical errors occurred, factual mistakes such as
the misplacement of some electoral areas in certain constituencies irked
the members of the committee to approve and recommend the rejection of
the CI.
The second uncertainty with the coming into existence has to do with
the inadequate time for the new constituencies to partake in the
exhibition of the biometric voters register by the EC which takes on
September 1-10. Political watchers ask: what happens to the new
constituencies which are to come into being after that period?
Meanwhile, the General Secretary of the NPP, Mr Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie,
has accused the EC Chairman Dr Kwadwo Afari Gyan of yielding to the
governing National Democratic Congress's (NDC) manipulation to take
advantage of the new constituencies which is tantamount to
gerrymandering. According to Mr Owusu Afriyie, the several decisions by
the EC including creation of 45 new constituencies gives backing to the
NPP's claim.
Despite the uncertainty hanging on the creation of the
constituencies, some parties are vetting parliamentary candidates for
the proposed constituencies, while others are adopting a wait-and-see
approach. The NDC has already started interviewing person to represent
the yet-to-be created constituencies. The NPP says it awaiting the court
decisions on the creation of the constituencies whilst the Convention
People's Party calls for annulment of the creation of the new
constituencies.
According to a report by The Ghanaian Times, the Subsidiary
Legislation Committee considered petitions from some Ghanaians and civil
society groups such as the Ghana Centre for Democratic Development
(CDD-Ghana), a policy and governance think tank, gave about four reasons
why the creation of the new constituencies must be stopped.
CDD observed that the EC appears to have misinterpreted the law that
grants them power to review constituencies to mean increase in the
number. For them, review means altering boundaries of constituencies and
not necessarily to increase the number. Another reason put forth by CDD
was that a subtle perception exists that the EC was favouring the NDC
in creating the new constituencies. CDD also said MPs are currently
without logistics and research assistances, noting that adding more will
only worsen the situation. The CDD maintained that the existing ones
must be maintained and well resourced instead.
Credit: Public Agenda
No comments:
Post a Comment